Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
Logica Capital's chief strategist believes China could attack the Bitcoin network for just $7 billion per year.
Michael Green, chief strategist and partner at investment advisory firm Logica Capital, sounded the alarm about Chinaâs Bitcoin (BTC) mining dominance during a debate with crypto proponent Anthony Pompliano.
The discussion between the Bitcoin skeptic and the Bitcoin bull has just been published by digital asset media outlet Real Vision.
Green emphasized the dominant share of hash rate located within Chinaâs borders, describing the network as âincredibly vulnerableâ from the perspective of the United States.
âThe vast majority of the mining activity is occurring in regions like China, Russia and Iran, and if we incorporate the participation of mining pools, they control in excess of 90% of the hash rate. This is not a decentralized system,â said Green.
âThe current estimate of how much it would cost to shut down the Bitcoin network [...] if, for example, China were to decide simply to start mining empty blocks [...] is around $7 billion a year. For a nation-state, thatâs nothing.â
âIt's completely absurd that the U.S. government would put itself into a situation in which the control of the monetary system was outsourced in the same manner that we've chosen to outsource our iPhone production,â he added.
But Pomp described Greenâs assertion as flawed, asserting that Bitcoin is âthe strongest computing network in the world [...] by every measure.â He noted recent âdiversificationâ in the Chinese centralization of hash rate, emphasizing significant increases in the hash power commanded by U.S.-based entities.
Pompliano also challenged Greenâs inference that the geographical distribution of Bitcoinâs hash rate is representative of the capacity for a nation-state to exert control over the network, stating, âJust because there is any sort of capital flow elsewhere does not mean that those governments control it.â
Green also characterized Bitcoin as a conduit for criminality and a tool used by enemies of the United States to bypass and undermine the dollar. Ultimately, Green predicted it is only a matter of time until the U.S. government moves to ban BTC.
âIn terms of a ban of ownership, I'm not advocating for that," he said. "I'm actually suggesting that I think [a ban] is the eventual outcome. Whether that is good or bad will ultimately be decided by the future."
Rebutting, Pomp argued that should Greenâs worldview prevail, the United States will make the mistake of excluding itself from the global financial revolution that blockchain and crypto will drive:
âMike, I think, has this belief that other countries are benefiting from an open, digital, decentralized protocol â he's not wrong. But the reaction or the end result of that should not be we, therefore, are going to opt out because that will not stop these other countries from using their open, digital, decentralized protocol.â
âWe should embrace [Bitcoin] and ensure that the United States stays the leader on a global scale,â he added.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.