Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
The CFTCâs Brian Quintenz has addressed the question of accountability in an era of disintermediated finance and smart contracts.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)âs Brian Quintenz has addressed the question of accountability in an era of disintermediated finance and smart contracts. The commissioner made his remarks at the 38th Annual GITEX Technology Week Conference in Dubai Tuesday, Oct. 16.
Broadly, the commissioner proposed that when it comes enforcement actions, not only users, but the coders themselves may be held to account. Quintez explained:
âThe appropriate question is whether these code developers could reasonably foresee, at the time they created the code, that it would likely be used by U.S. persons in a manner violative of CFTC regulations."
Quintenz framed his discussion by noting the complications that arise when applying traditional legal paradigms to âthe disintermediated world of blockchain,â emphasizing the challenges that the emerging sector poses to the CFTCâs particular role, which is intermediary-focused and centers on preserving market integrity through oversight.
In the case of disintermediated finance, however, the key players are instead the core developers of a given blockchain network, its miners and users, all of whom operate in an âanonymous, decentralizedâ framework.
To tackle the regulatory concerns raised by this context, Quintenz focused in particular on smart contracts, which function on a blockchain and are programmed to interact according to binding, pre-specified rules.
As Quintenz noted, these contracts are âself-enforcing,â and âoperate without further intervention.â However, he rebutted the well-known crypto adage âcode is law,â arguing that even though smart contracts complicate existing frameworks and the question of accountability, they nonetheless fall subject to regulations and particular legal precedents.
In many cases, he argued, the basic nature of such contracts can be identified as having the âessential characteristicsâ of traditional derivatives products: they may resemble a swap, or have âexchange-like functions by facilitating trading.â
One such example would arise with individuals who develop âpredictive data about future financial events, like a stockâs performance [...] [and] offer their data for purchase via smart contracts.â
The offering of this data could fall under regulatorsâ purview either through being deemed âinvestment advice,â or even, âgiven the anonymity of the predictions,â being considered to be ânefariouslyâ enabling âinsider trading.â
In other cases, smart contract protocols enable âindividuals to bet on the outcome of future events, like sporting events or electionsâ using crypto, which he suggested can in some cases resemble what the CFTC considers to be a ââprediction market,â noting that:
âIn the past, the CFTC has generally prohibited prediction markets as contrary to the public interest, only permitting them in limited circumstances when it has found that they operate on a small-scale, non-profit basis, and serve academic purposes.â
As reported yesterday, former CFTC chairman Gary Gensler emphasized that most tokens sold through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) should be classified as securities, and be brought under the regulatory purview of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Â
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.