Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
Despite what the popular media may report, cryptocurrency didnât start with Bitcoin. On the contrary, the concept of anonymous digital cash goes back to the 80s! Not only is anonymous digital cash an ancient idea in tech years, but its original conception was far different from what we accept today as cryptocurrency.
A quick note: Iâll refer to anonymous digital cash as âbitcashâ from here on, to avoid repetition.
Now, letâs dive in!
Devised in 1982 by that great wizardly guru of cryptography, David Chaum, bitcash was a groundbreaking achievement. In the same paper that discussed the potential of an anonymous digital future, Chaum devised âblind signaturesâ, the basis of the entire system. A blind signature is when someone signs some piece of content, ensuring the recipient that only that person could have signed it, without the signer knowing what the content is. Itâs almost like signing a contract without reading itâââyou wouldnât want to do this in real life, of course, but it has interesting applications when it becomes a digital process.
As described in Applied Cryptography, with blind signatures, a bank can âsignâ a âmoney orderâ (all digital, of course), without knowing that Alice is the one requesting funds. Used in combination with anonymity-preserving tech like âmix networksâ or the âdining cryptographers protocolâ, Alice can send this digital âmoney orderâ to Bob under a pseudonym, or completely anonymously.
This is the first difference between bitcash and modern cryptocurrency: while banks are beginning to dabble in cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency is inherently decentralized. Bitcash, on the other hand, relied on existing financial institutions.
Although decentralization is generally a good thing, federation by the banks has a few benefits, bringing us to the second difference between bitcash and cryptocurrency: bitcash is truly, provably anonymous. With cryptocurrency, transactions are usually, ostensibly anonymous. However, every transaction is tied to an identity of some kind. With bitcash, anonymity is built-in.
That brings me to another benefit of bitcash: guaranteed untraceability. Cryptocurrency relies on the blockchain, an immutable ledger of every transaction that ever happenedâââbitcash has no such need, and itâs still able to prevent double-spending and fraud!
Chaumâs work inspired a revolution in the way technologists thought about cryptography. Among those inspired were the âcypherpunksâ, formed in 1992 primarily by Eric Hughes and Timothy C. May (the name was coined by the great Jude Milhon, about whom I could write an entire article). They envisioned a world where privacy, anonymity, and free speech were mathematically guaranteed, built-in to every internet service.
It started with mix networks, email chains that pass along messages like notes in a classroom. Unlike those notes, however, messages on mix networks are encrypted with public keys in onion-like layers, so no one in between can read them.
Likewise, only the first mailer in the chain knows who the sender is, and only the last mailer in the chain knows the recipient. The former can be remedied with another protocol, another procedure called âthe dining cryptographersâ. The latter is like a courier delivery: they know the recipient, but not what their message says or even who sent it.
Dining cryptographer networks, or âDC netsâ, are networks of 3 or more people who want to publish something anonymously. The protocol is traditionally described as a group of diners who wants to know whether the NSA paid, without revealing the identity of anyone who paid at the table. Every pair of cryptographers flips a coin apiece. Then, each person announces the XOR of each partnerâs coin, inverting the result if they paid. If the XOR of each announced result is 0, none of the cryptographers paid, i.e. no data was transmitted). If the result is 1, one of the cryptographers paid, i.e. transmitted a bit.
Put together, these protocols are incredibly powerful. You can publish under a pseudonym, with guaranteed anonymity. You can pay a person without them knowing who you are, and vice versa. But it gets betterâŠ
If entire networks exist like this, where people can send data anonymously, why not receive data anonymously? Why not create a network where you can share content, and it is propagated throughout the network, such that you can request content like a web page, or a resume, or a song, and do it anonymously, privately.
For better or worse, the dream of the âcypherpunksâ, or god forbid, the subset of cypherpunks known as the âcrypto anarchistsâ, never came to fruition. There are several reasons for this, but it can be summed up here: no regular folks cared enough about anonymity and privacy online to jump through the myriad hoops required to use crypto software, and in the post-9/11 world, there were real and serious concerns about such systems that came to the forefront.
If this article had a point, if there were a moral to the story, it would be this: existing cryptocurrencies are not the end-all, be-all of digital currency, and if you look at the history of cryptography, it never has been. Iâm not going to dive into the debate of true anonymity and privacy and its ramifications in this article, although Iâd be happy to do so in the comments section. Letâs all just keep in mind: cryptocurrency as we know it is just another point in a much larger timeline, a chapter in a much larger story thatâs still playing out. Iâm excited to see where it goes.
Cryptocurrency: What is and What Could Have Been was originally published in Hacker Noon on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.