Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
Anyone who says Bitcoin is a decentralized payment technology is bullshitting, according to noted economist Nouriel Roubini.
The chairman of Roubini Macro Associates called the cryptocurrency a âtotal flopâ because it allocates power to only a handful of people. He claimed that almost every business activity that took place inside the Bitcoin industry has turned centralized. Mining, for instance, is now in the hands of a few big players, as not envisioned in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. Exchanges, too, practice significant control over the cryptocurrencyâs liquidity and price.
Roubini also noted that a higher percentage of Bitcoin wealth belongs to a lesser number of people, which means they could move the cryptocurrency trend in any direction based on their preferences. Excerpts:
âVitalik Buterin [the Ethereum co-founder] spoke about the inconsistent trinity. You can only encrypt something decentralized, scalable, and secure. Crypto does not satisfy even one of them let alone two of them.â
Bitcoin Takes Finance Back to Stone Age
The statements appeared during a debate with BitMEX CEO & co-founder Arthur Hayes held last week at the Asia Blockchain Summit 2019 in Taiwanâs Taipei. Mayes projected Bitcoin as a technology that gives people financial security and freedom without needing a bank while Roubini dissented entirely.
The economist went on bashing Bitcoin for its lack of security, citing how centralized exchanges controlled 99 percent of the cryptocurrency trading. They didnât have what it takes to secure their clientsâ funds, which is reflective in the higher number of hacking incidents that took place in the past decade. Roubini further thrashed the idea of having public keys as a mean to protect oneself against an exchangeâs immaturity, stating that anybody with a gun can force a person into sharing those private keys.
âIf somebody holds me to a gunpoint and take me to an ATM, then there is 300 bucks out of me not $300 million. Bitcoin is completely insecure,â said Roubini. âInstead of being a sophisticated financial system, it goes back to the stone age.â
Hayes, on the other hand, believed that letting people have complete ownership of their money is what Bitcoin excelled at entirely.
âBitcoin is for personal sovereignty. If you hold your keys, you are much less likely to lose them,â he reasoned.
Attacking Bitcoin Network is Bad for Everybody
On Nouriel Roubiniâs remarks on centralization in Bitcoin mining, Hayes explained to the scholar that a mining pool does not necessarily mean a single operatorâs control over the Bitcoin network. A pool comprises of many small miners allocating a certain percentage of computation power to confirm and add blocks on the blockchain.
âBitcoin,â added Hayes, âhas not faced a single 51 percent attack happening on the network and destroying the value. Because at the end of the day, if a miner or group of miners colluded to, say, reverse transactions, they would essentially bring the infrastructureâs worth down to zero. It is not in their interest to violate these rules and that is the whole point and that is why Bitcoin is more secure than any centralized system.â
Do you buy Dr. Doomâs âBitcoin is bullshitâ narrative? Let us know in the comments below!Â
Image via Shutterstock
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.