Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
Since March 12, the Makerdao community has been struggling with the stablecoin DAI which has been over $4 million undercollaterized since the crypto market carnage started. On March 18, the developers plan to auction newly minted maker (MKR) tokens in order to remove the outstanding debt. However, the auction might not be enough and the Makerdao community is debating on adding the stablecoin USDC as collateral.
Also read: ETH Price Strains Defi Collateral Loans as âBlack Swanâ Event Strikes Makerdao
Makerdao Community Debates Adding USDC for Collateral
The price of ethereum (ETH) has lost more than 40% in fiat value during the last week. News.Bitcoin.com reported on how the decentralized finance (defi) community watched Makerdaoâs significant issues which resulted in over $4 million in DAI undercollateralized. Because the project uses ethereum (ETH) as collateral, the combined effects of the price of ETH falling and oracle discrepancies hurt the projectâs collateralized loans.
The price of ethereum (ETH) has slid over 40% downwards since March 12, 2020. This has caused more than $4 million worth of loans to be undercollaterized.
To tackle the issues, Makerdao developers revealed they would be auctioning newly issued MKR to remove the debts incurred by the market bloodbath. The auctioning of new MKR is described in the projectâs whitepaper as a method that can be used to stave off undercollateralized positions. However, in the eyes of a few MKR leaders, the auction to mitigate DAI liquidity risk in an uncertain market might not be enough. According to a recently published community forum post, the team is debating whether they should use the stablecoin USDC as collateral. Basically a stablecoin to make sure the other stablecoin holds its peg.
âGiven the ongoing liquidity risk of DAI in an uncertain market, both the community and members of the Maker Foundation have been making noise in the official chat about onboarding USDC as collateral as an emergency measure to help mitigate this liquidity risk,â explains a post written by the MKR forum user Longforwisdom. âNaturally this would need to be confirmed by governance, and go through an executive vote, but at this stage, the Foundation is making the technical preparations to make this possible.â
âA Band-Aid to a Deeper Underlying Liquidity Problemâ
Longforwisdom also lists a number of pros and cons that would apply to the project if they leveraged USDC for collateral. A few positive examples include helping to âcreate DAI liquidity and push the DAI peg back towards $1,â that would â[allow] vault holders to close their vaults without eating the loss,â and it could bolster âFLIP [and] FLOP auctions.â Negatives to adding USDC would be things like âreducing the âpurityâ of DAI,â â[it] comes with regulatory risk,â and a ââblacklistâ riskâ as well. If Makerdao was to add USDC they would need to address the stability fee, liquidation ratio, debt ceiling, and possibly getting away without using oracles, Longforwisdom underscored. âI think itâs a good idea to add USDC as collateral, to enable liquidity to be added to the market for emergencies,â the forum user Jiecart responded. âCurrently DAI is trading >1.07, thereâs a lot of demand for DAI liquidity.â
âTo me, it sounds like a band-aid to a deeper underlying liquidity problem which ought to be solved with careful consideration,â MKR community member Aeno wrote. The Makerdao supporter added:
As to the USDC proposal itself, there are new economical risk that can sneak in with such a solution and mixing it with an otherwise decentralized system ⊠Lastly, I echo the sentiment that I am in this project for its pure decentralized nature and would not want to see it becoming inter-mixed with USDC. If it were, I would rather just want to stick with USDC altogether.
The Coinbase and Circle Financial backed stablecoin USDC has seen enormous growth since the market carnage on âBlack Thursday.â âUSDC surging in market demand over the past days, reaching new ATH at $568M in circulation,â Circle cofounder Jeremy Allaire tweeted on March 14.
At the time of publication, single collateral DAI is struggling to keep balance and is showing liquidity issues. The price per DAI is around $1.03 per token right now and the stablecoin has been fluctuating wildly since March 12. Sometimes a DAI can be less than $1 and other times it will trade for a few cents above like it is today. If the price of ethereum drops even further then the millions worth of ETH currently held in collateral will be liquidated. Meanwhile, the stablecoin USDC has seen significant growth since the crypto market dipped last Thursday.
What do you think about the Makerdao community members discussing whether or not they want to include the stablecoin USDC as collateral? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Cryptocurrency prices referenced in this article were recorded on Tuesday, March 17, 2020.
Image credits: Shutterstock, coinmarketcap.com, Markets.Bitcoin.com, Fair Use, Wiki Commons, Makerdao Logo, DAI logo, and Pixabay.
Do you want to maximize your Bitcoin Mining potential? Plug your own hardware into the worldâs most profitable Bitcoin mining pool or get started without having to own hardware through one of our competitive Bitcoin cloud mining contracts.
Â
The post Devs Debate Using USDC for Collateral After DAI Stablecoin Faces Liquidity Issues appeared first on Bitcoin News.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.