Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
âWe should act now to improve access to financial services through other means as well â the need is too great," said Tim Massad.
Tim Massad, who served as chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission until 2017, said the United States is too slow in developing a plan to modernize its payment systems.
In a Wednesday hearing of the Joint Economic Committee on the role of digital assets in government, Massad said a central bank digital currency, or CBDC, could be one solution for the United States to improve its existing payments systems, which he referred to as âslowâ and âexpensive.â In addition, the former CFTC chair said while stablecoins could be used for this purpose, they also presented some of the most urgent challenges for U.S. regulators and pose significant risks.
Massad said that people using stablecoins like Tether (USDT) to move funds between exchanges was a good example of why the U.S. payment system needs to be modernized. However, he added the stablecoin issuerâs reserves were likely not invested in âhighly safe liquid assetsâ like the dollar and thus not insured in the same way as funds in traditional financial institutions. The former CFTC head said his recommendation would be to adopt âbank-likeâ regulations but also prevent issuers from making loans to eliminate the need for deposit insurance.
âCBDCs, stablecoins and digital assets generally are often cited as a means to achieve greater financial inclusion, and we should consider their potential for doing so,â said Massad. âWe should act now to improve access to financial services through other means as well â the need is too great.â
Related: Former CFTC chair explains why regulators should approve a Bitcoin ETF
Coin Center director of research Peter Van Valkenburgh, also in attendance at the hearing, called stablecoins an âinteresting areaâ in the crypto space but voiced concerns about the seeming lack of regulatory clarity for issuers.
âThere are certainly some stablecoin issuers who are violating the law,â said Van Valkenburgh, adding:Â
âThere are also regulated stablecoin issuers and there is also the possibility of creating more of a federal home for regulation of stablecoins. We donât have a legal gap there, I think â we just have an enforcement gap.â
The comments from both Van Valkenburgh and Massad come following a report from the Presidentâs Working Group on Financial Markets suggesting that stablecoin issuers in the U.S. should be subject to âappropriate federal oversightâ akin to that of banks. The group said legislation is âurgently needed to comprehensively address the prudential risks posed by payment stablecoin arrangements.â
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.