Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
The proposed legislation would require exchanges to verify personal data behind any transaction.
Less than a week after a potential ban on proof-of-work (PoW) digital assets was dropped from the EUâs prospective MiCA framework, a new threat to the crypto industry could be emerging in the European Union. This time, it is non-custodial, or unhosted, wallets that are in regulatorsâ crosshairs.
On Thursday, March 31, the European Parliament Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs will vote on an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulatory package that seeks to revise the current Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR) in a way that extends the requirement of financial institutions to attach information on the transacting parties to crypto assets. The rapporteurs of the regulation are Ernest Urtasun from the Greens and Assita Kano from the Conservatives and Reformists group.
As crypto advocate Patrick Hansen from blockchain firm Unstoppable DeFi warned, the latest draft of the regulation would require crypto service providers not only to collect personal data related to transfers made to and from unhosted wallets (as they are already obliged to do) but also to âverify the accuracy of information with respect to the originator or beneficiary behind the unhosted wallet.â
The obvious problem with this language is that, in many cases, it can be difficult, if not impossible, for crypto service providers to verify an âunhostedâ counterpart. Thus, to stay compliant and safeguard their place in the EU market, these companies would be forced to cut off transactions with unhosted wallets, Hansen fears.
Even if legislators put some guidelines for verification procedures in place, the potential operational costs of compliance would likely scare off smaller players and lead to further market concentration.
The draft also includes the obligation to inform the âcompetent AML authorities'' of any transfer worth 1,000 EUR or more to/from an unhosted wallet. Moreover, in one year after the billâs enactment, the EU Commission would be required to assess whether any âadditional specific measures to mitigate the risksâ from such transactions are needed.
Itâs not quite clear what additional measures could be implied but, as Hansen warned, this could mean anything down to the outright ban on non-custodial wallets.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.