Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
In the free market, the laws of supply and demand would suggest that the lower the price of something is, the easier it is to sell itāāāBased on this, you could infer that something which costs $0 and which delivers real value to its users would āfly off the shelvesā.
Unfortunately, this is rarely the case when it comes to open source software. When applied to the software industry, the laws of supply and demand seem to break down in surprising ways.
One unusual aspect of the industry is that the supply curve for software does not taper off as it gets closer to the $0 price point; even at that point, there is still a lot of competitionāāāNot only between different open source projects but also between āfreeā (ad-supported) software services.
What is most surprising about the software industry though is that solutions offered at a $0 price point often find themselves having to compete with equivalent software solutions at a much higher price point. This clearly defies the laws of supply and demand and indicates that there are other forces atĀ play.
One of those forces is advertising; unlike open source software, commercial software can tap into its profits (or VC funding) to launch targeted advertising campaigns to skew public awareness and opinions in its favor; this targeted advertising creates a false sense of added value in the minds of consumersāāāIt taps into peopleās fears and their beliefs that the most expensive solution is more reliable and delivers the mostĀ value.
Another force which works in favor of commercial software is the highly interconnected (and centralized) financial landscape of the software industry; this is particularly relevant when it comes to B2B solutions. SaaS startups which have financial connections to venture capitalists can leverage those connections to gain access to big corporate clients. The tech industry as a whole is a minefield when it comes to conflicts of interest; to the point that they are often ignored completely. As an extreme example, even today, itās not uncommon for popular tech blogs/publications to have direct financial interests in many of the companies that they help toĀ promote.
The current economic landscape of the software industry has made it very difficult for open source software to exist, let alone compete for market share. Even companies behind some of the most popular open source solutions find themselves resorting to business model innovations like the infamous āCommons Clauseā in order to keep their projects in a financial equilibrium. When Redis Labs decided to apply the Commons Clause to some of its optional add-on modules, there was immediate and significant backlash from the community.
Itās ironic that most people donāt seem to bat an eyelash when it comes to locking themselves into expensive proprietary ecosystems like Amazon Lambda/AWS but they canāt tolerate the idea of an open source company like Redis Labs trying to monetize a few optional add-on modules on theĀ side.
Surprisingly, people seem to get upset at the idea of an ecosystem which is open at the core but proprietary on the edges but nobody seems to be getting upset about the opposite scenario which is an ecosystem that is proprietary at its core and open source only on the edges. No one is complaining about the existence of the Serverless framework for example; even though its main purpose is to be a gateway drug to Amazonās proprietary ecosystem.
When it comes to ethics, it doesnāt make sense that companies whose core mission is to develop open source software should be held to a higher standard than commercial software vendors whose core mission is to generate profits; it should be the opposite.
The harsh economics of open source was originally published in Hacker Noon on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.