Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
I just read a question that David, our CEO at Hacker Noon, had for Muneeb Ali, CEO of Blockstack. In this question, David said,
Sometimes for people who lack patience, like myself, a truly decentralized internet can feel about as close as the afterlife. In a lot of ways the internet is even more centralized than age old industries like real estate. The infrastructural approachesâââlike the one Blockstack is takingâââare long but necessary work to a more decentralized internet.
I have to agree, and disagree, at the same time. Let me explain, first by disagreeing.
Weâre closer than weâve ever been. The technology is finally catching up to the dreams painstakingly sketched in whitepapers from the 60s to the 90s. We have computers so fast that Diffie-Hellman key exchange, where you get a secret key transmitted over an open, vulnerable network, is dirt cheap. RSA is no longer as cost-prohibitive as it used to be. At the same time, Iâm fucking terrified of whatâs to come.
Anonymity and privacy are a thing of the past. No longer is it reasonable to use PGP and remailers to preserve your privacy. Tor is a honeypot. Blockchain-based, decentralized, distributed apps are notoriously difficult to implement, and the blockchain is ultimately an open ledgerâââthereâs no anonymity (or pseudonyms with reputations, for that matter).
I want to be optimistic, with politicians like Elizabeth Warren threatening to break up tech monopolies, just as Standard Oil and Ma Bell were broken up in previous generations (Iâm bullish on Warren). To break up the centralized giants is to create a need for an alternative, which is more likely now than ever to be decentralized.
But (and thereâs always a âbutâ) the regulators are not our friends. Regulators, while in a trusted position, are all too human, and are susceptible to all the corruption, viciousness, and evil that any human is capable of. Iâm not saying government is evil, just that absolute power corrupts absolutely. See: the NSAâs PRISM program, the Clipper Chip, the Tuskeegee Experiments, apartheid in South Africa, and so on, etc.
So why do I say âthe decentralized internet is closer than you thinkâ?
I think things are going to come to a head. The internet is going to expose so much information, or software is going to kill so many people by human mistake in the code, that regulators will have to step in out of their very responsibility. What will we do in that scenario?
There are a few options, as I see it. We can accept whatever regulation the legislators deem fit, and hope they understand the technology well enough to craft the law correctly. We can create our own self-regulation, such that legislators will borrow concepts and legal language from the existing frameworks. Or, people will go underground.
In any case, people are going to go underground. Iâve often thought about computingâs usefulness in post-apocalyptic scenarios. What good would my skill do, in that situation? Communications is the obvious answer, and obviously, you wouldnât have centralized entities as we know them in that scenario. Decentralized networks would become a necessity. Likewise, the criminal underground, terrorist groups, drug dealers, human traffickers, and all sorts of unsavory folks would populate this sort of network, because in a fully decentralized system, youâd have to have some notion of trust and reputation, however a given network might define it.
Itâs ultimately more human, to have a decentralized network. Itâs closer to what we actually do in real life. At least, the way I see it, trust and reputation systems in a decentralized network would ideally derive from the way people actually interact. If I know Dane, and Dane knows Janet, and Janet knows Frank, I might be able to talk to Frank, but I wouldnât trust him as much as Janet, and I wouldnât trust her as much as Dane, and so on. Through repeated interaction, we gain trust, but as they say, âtrust is earned in drops and lost in bucketsâ.
This is turning into a rant, but my point is this: decentralized networks are closer than you think. Theyâre bubbling under the surface, waiting for the right time, the right place. The possibilities are laid out before us, but the question is:
What will it take for the majority of people to adopt decentralized networks? Will it be an underground movement? A criminal underground? Or a revolution in the way we use computers, to put data back in the control of the people who create it?
HOT TAKE EDIT: fuck me, that got dark. Hereâs something to brighten up your day:
Originally published at https://community.hackernoon.com on May 28, 2019.
The Decentralized Internet is Closer than You Think was originally published in Hacker Noon on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.